Abstract: Individual voices play an important role in group dynamics, especially in high-stakes, consensus-based environments, as demonstrated by 12 Angry Men. The play mostly showcases the courage and influence of Juror 8, who brings in the idea of reasonable doubt in an effort to reverse the initial majority verdict in a murder trial. By his composed determination and logical argument, the story illustrates how an individual's reluctance to follow may provoke thinking, challenge assumptions, and eventually change the attitudes of a whole group. The play provides a compelling examination of social pressure, moral duty, and the processes of large-scale change and opposition. Therefore, 12 Angry Men is a powerful metaphor for the importance of individual initiative in group judgements. emphasizing that even in the face of overwhelming opposition, a single voice can catalyse.

| DOI: 10.17148/IARJSET.2025.12447